Issue:
Allocation of funding for STEM initiatives:
·
recipients need to
be held accountable of spend – funded providers do use an
intervention recording numbers of beneficiaries, but will often
double account the young people so reducing the value of the
investment. If more stringent accountability, it would make
the £ more powerful
Issue:
Scattergun approach of delivering STEM
interventions
·
Develop and define
clear pathways of STEM interventions that will
encourage:
o
discovery of the
STEM subjects, building a curiosity to
o
develop and
further the skills for STEM,
o
creating future
interest to seek further education and eventual employment in the
STEM subject area.
Issue: Quality
of delivery
·
Funded
interventions are not currently required to meet any specific
quality standards.
Issue: Return
on investment
·
There
is no real ROI required for funded interventions and
engagement. Looking at a progression of impact from pre and
post evaluation, followed by longer term impressions and
destinations.
Issue: There
may be a lack of understanding for teachers, parents and young
people of the wide range of industry sectors and career
opportunities available within localities and
regions
·
Raise
awareness of opportunities and what that looks like
Issue: Careers
awareness
·
A
systematic employer engagement programme will improve awareness of
different careers and pathways to those careers.
Issue:
Employability Skills
·
Promote and instil
employability skills required by employers to enable smoother
transition from education to the world of work. Starting with
the earliest of interventions (pre-school)
Issue: Pre NEET
and NEET
·
all
young people are potentially pre NEET, the focus of schemes and
funding needs to be proactive and focus on reducing numbers moving
into the NEET category. Currently the emphasis is on those
who are NEET and is reactive. Prevention of NEETs should be
able to be achieved by early interventions
|